Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.

Craig Daniel on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:54:10 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
From: Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:54:03 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Ooy901Y6XrMYOgZ7+0AA3s9difDQymB7ex0qvA1IZW4=; b=shAh3gRr712RbvX0rsIPyEedRR9tdBrWxMwNRcSDWg3kbmV3vRsxF5lwfjWoErdL0c 7GPsnN7xP9k6YYfwcFI1Z2f7qFuHLt4aMPyHCIlhAXgNZI08UA1wmrxZalY3Uyr1sMzo hxDpdHZaF0cFZeidMe4RxM0Q8V6bdGrFlEap0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=u4uxDQv5U+6fr/7npMP2Q6PI852P/Q5HN7LBGInpVbkSgkJY7vZLdMYzcpECyLFmNN cncmO3opXRdMn9pYww8fsMGcrP/crPHLedq/J2fqOCkNneyCHDP+MtmIoX+yvffDRSOQ yu1AU3pRt6/xIg5vMrYeqIPaJYbccw4CwDrYc=
In-reply-to: <1234560061.8206.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <e82ef423f41fd3f6dabe014b6aeb4edd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902131136web7ea15x7717f6078895b10e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234554434.8206.23.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20902131230y5a87ba13mfdf651e5c07325d0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1de9d4fc0902131303o1417e9dbm3ef5886c398f5c8e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1234560061.8206.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-02-13 at 15:03 -0600, David E. Smith wrote:
>> Depending upon precisely HOW literally one wishes to interpret this rule, it
>> may well be mathematically impossible ever to pass another ballot. There
>> probably have been thousands of votes cast between (whenever this was
>> active) and (now), such that without some clever player-cloning scheme no
>> one ballot will ever earn enough affirmative votes to overcome several years
>> of inertia.
> "Players may vote multiple times; the last vote on any given issue shall
> be the one counted."
>
> Not sure if that affects things... It probably rules out the
> interpretation above, by implying that votes are on a particular issue.
>
> In fact, it possibly means a proposal passes if the last vote cast for
> it (by anyone) was FOR, even if previous votes were AGAINST.

I'll leave it to you to figure out what proposals passed, then.

> We're going to have fun with this Sixth Era, I think...

Yeah.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: David E. Smith

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: Craig Daniel
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: David E. Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
  - From: Alex Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] B never started
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] declaration
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread