| Craig Daniel on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:36:29 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse. |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 2:07 PM, <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I refuse to agree to any Emergency Forum. The first version of the archived rules (from nweek 1, and thus known to be the original set) doesn't have any emergency procedures, but they appear by the time rules, rather than the ruleset, are no longer allowed to change the ruleset, so the above works as a gamestate collapse. Sadly, looking at the initial rules, I have discovered that it relies on not obeying the modern tradition of excessive literalism and that under modern B game custom we're not allowed to agree that any proposals have ever passed: "A proposal passes if, and only if, it receives a majority of affirmative votes." (Rule 32/0) Given that each ballot has multiple proposals, I don't think a majority of the affirmative votes have ever demonstrably been on a single validly-distributed ballot. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss