Craig Daniel on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:57:02 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse. |
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alexander Smith <AIS523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > scheme was right. Also, note that nothing causes the outcome of such a > scheme to actually be correct, which is important; generally speaking, > people listen to them to determine what the true gamestate is. Also, a > healthy discussion on s-d is a sort of meta-dispute-resolution-scheme that > works no matter what the gamestate.) Really? I'm not used to that actually producing an answer that was as broken as the average pre-discussion opinion or better. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss