Craig Daniel on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:57:02 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.


On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Alexander Smith <AIS523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> scheme was right. Also, note that nothing causes the outcome of such a
> scheme to actually be correct, which is important; generally speaking,
> people listen to them to determine what the true gamestate is. Also, a
> healthy discussion on s-d is a sort of meta-dispute-resolution-scheme that
> works no matter what the gamestate.)

Really?

I'm not used to that actually producing an answer that was as broken
as the average pre-discussion opinion or better.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss