Cassie Bayer on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:48:30 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse.


2009/2/13 David E. Smith <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> >
> > Apologies for top posting phone and all. Is that a single document or is
> > each rule separate?
> >
>
> Like I said, under the assumption (which is far from proven) that those are
> the rules, that's the entire ruleset on one page. The whole thing would
> probably fit on three or four printed pages.
>
> I'm pretty sure I'm not an active player right now, and I honestly haven't
> been following the game that closely in a while - I'm just here because
> there's a slight chance I've been the Administrator for the last eight
> years, and I'm just doing a really lousy job of it. :)
>
> Since the 2001 ruleset had no arbitration or justice system (this was by
> design), it's probably better if this question get settled using whatever
> rules for that presently exist. In the event my presence as Administrator
> is
> required to resolve a nasty paradox, I'll try to do so, with the
> understanding that someone else should take the job real soon.
>

If the current arbitration/justice system is used to settle this question,
then they could not find that only the 2001 ruleset is in force, otherwise
they would have no authority to make such a finding. (A Paradox)
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss