Cassie Bayer on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:48:30 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Gamestate collapse. |
2009/2/13 David E. Smith <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Apologies for top posting phone and all. Is that a single document or is > > each rule separate? > > > > Like I said, under the assumption (which is far from proven) that those are > the rules, that's the entire ruleset on one page. The whole thing would > probably fit on three or four printed pages. > > I'm pretty sure I'm not an active player right now, and I honestly haven't > been following the game that closely in a while - I'm just here because > there's a slight chance I've been the Administrator for the last eight > years, and I'm just doing a really lousy job of it. :) > > Since the 2001 ruleset had no arbitration or justice system (this was by > design), it's probably better if this question get settled using whatever > rules for that presently exist. In the event my presence as Administrator > is > required to resolve a nasty paradox, I'll try to do so, with the > understanding that someone else should take the job real soon. > If the current arbitration/justice system is used to settle this question, then they could not find that only the 2001 ruleset is in force, otherwise they would have no authority to make such a finding. (A Paradox) _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss