| Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:03:16 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks |
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:00 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Well done ehird, you just killed B. > Doubt it. I just agree with your earlier point about ISIDTID not being valid. A while back, we had no rule concerning ISIDTID. Someone tried to ISIDTID, we had a Consultation on whether or not it worked, decided it didn't work, and made an explicit rule about it. I don't see why we can't do the same now. I don't follow your point about how ehird (if successful) would have killed B, mostly because I doubt he was successful anyway. Incidentally, if whatever he did killed B and disallowed any Game Actions from being taken, then because there is at least a shred of ambiguity with regard to whether or not ehird was successful, then ONLY logical answer to a Consultation on whether or not he succeeded is NO. If he succeeded, then we can't play the game. Let's just stick with the quantum state where he failed. BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss