Re: [s-d] [s-b] Scam theft

Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 26 Dec 2008 15:09:39 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Scam theft

To: spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Scam theft
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2008 17:09:33 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=QUN2lB9VyXBVISuTT3rUhWWJMkhcjvK2CGQxZH2HPWw=; b=iC9vy/z/F4w5pRky1JOzYe8dtRjbAQQvjsyBOrme8slunGrGjnGlLsSBtnZAb1DlKo 9sHtymNJ+Ee6PZ6jADNpS2LUi9MZKNlq3i2QQQyzfJiYOWrdf1y1jM8AuwQ+12nFzDoP 2cKwJpYuAUgaseDR/1dWhp62wXZo2Koxzkleo=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=FcG0kk8wNsft40QKO4dnsmL3weP10r3DN6fjDZvi1buXfk6kCR9oU7hqq8XzW33/kx tYeM3E1ZrVerwkB02aECknkP66/U/VRXpFvhWaS1rut4WjxH7oQUddwuuOc6eoxqGWTK ESyUQ5YqrN57kPil+xHLvfx3aT7uYABc753YM=
In-reply-to: <1230316439.12290.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4954163E.6040900@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <E6820629-9502-436C-95D8-1C908A72B209@xxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812251643ka04dbf4sbbdfbcd8f421b27f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CF7B1EA1-DEA1-4BBF-BE8D-21574214D378@xxxxxxxxx> <F1FCC379-7E89-42D7-95B5-E3999483C47A@xxxxxxxxx> <1230309626.12290.4.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <34BE24B7-48F1-445E-97E7-BCA45E3ECD55@xxxxxxxxx> <1230314438.12290.16.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <058C12FF-A1A0-4018-993B-CD0924A51C30@xxxxxxxxx> <1230316439.12290.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Also, this
> rule explicitly defers to rule 5e0, and whenever this rule contradicts
> rule 5e0 this rule takes precedence.

WHAT does this mean? Seems like the two clauses in this sentence outright
contradict each other...

Which clause, in a sentence about precedence, should take precedence?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Alex Smith
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
  - From: Elliott Hird

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Foreign relations
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Foreign relations
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Scam theft
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation on tweaks
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread