| Alex Smith on Fri, 5 Dec 2008 12:25:42 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3 |
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 14:22 -0500, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > You've got me curious. Can you give me an example of how severability can > avoid the game ending via indeterminate legality of an action? I won Agora due to setting up a situation in which it was paradoxical whether a particular CFJ (= Consultation) existed or not. We simply terminated the paradox by getting comex to withdraw the CFJ in question, thus the gamestate ended up the same either way. Severability meant that despite the CFJ's status being unknown, the rest of the game continued as normal. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss