Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3

[Tyler <wisety@xxxxxxxxx>]

I don't see why Oracularities were removed. This seems like a case for one,
since the rules aren't very clear.

Oh, and how are we to decide who gets assigned this Consultation? Maybe BP
could do a die roll and hope that j gets assigned it anyway! Or we could
submit about 10 consultations that say the same thing and ZOT the ones that
don't get rolled right. (Now there's a way to cheat the flawed system.)

On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> I submit the following Consultation:
> {
> Question: Is Codae the validly-assigned Priest for Consultations 152 and
> 153?
>
> Reasoning: If Players can mess with each other's Ordained Properties, then
> j and I were the only Ordained Players.  As j was the Supplicant for the
> Consultations, I was thus seleted as Priest by Default.
>
> However, if we can't mess with each others', then the Oracle should have
> randomly selected a Priest from among myself and some other people whose
> Ordained Properties I possibly removed.
> }
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>



-- 
 -Tyler
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss