Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3

Elliott Hird on Fri, 5 Dec 2008 07:50:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
From: Elliott Hird <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:50:28 +0000
In-reply-to: <1228485115.8267.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <498473.74002.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0812041936h129a7e7dyf7527c5cf3044360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <02C18A41-8DFA-4F25-9D6E-07CF3E36BDD2@xxxxxxxxx> <1228485115.8267.5.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 5 Dec 2008, at 13:51, Alex Smith wrote:

> Judgements having no purpose in the game is even more fun... No matter
> which way a Consultation is judged, it doesn't necessarily become  
> true,
> so we may find out months later that the judgement was wrong all  
> along.
> As I said in my RP, I plan to propose reintroducing Oracularities  
> (via a
> regular proposal) no matter how the RPs end up.

There is no one "true" gamestate in the sky.

It's all about culture.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
  - From: Elliott Hird
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
  - From: Alex Smith

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Murphy's RP, revised
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Tweak
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread