Alex Smith on Fri, 5 Dec 2008 06:52:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Era 5 Consultation 3 |
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 13:48 +0000, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 5 Dec 2008, at 03:36, Tyler wrote: > > > I don't see why Oracularities were removed. This seems like a case > > for one, > > since the rules aren't very clear. > > digging through oracularities to find out the gamestate is such fun Judgements having no purpose in the game is even more fun... No matter which way a Consultation is judged, it doesn't necessarily become true, so we may find out months later that the judgement was wrong all along. As I said in my RP, I plan to propose reintroducing Oracularities (via a regular proposal) no matter how the RPs end up. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss