Ed Murphy on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:00:55 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency |
teucer wrote: > Alternatively: the rule says "notify other PEPs", not "notify all > other PEPs". That's *wide* open for scamming and should be closed > immediately if we use it to justify this emergency (and all prior > ones), but it's how I read the rules as written. So I think we're good > for now, but by God that one needs fixing. The most natural interpretation of "notify other PEPs" in this context seems to be "notify a reasonable number of other PEPs". Posting to s-b also potentially informs non-subscribed PEPs (due to the existence of the web archives), though this is a considerably weaker line of argument. _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss