Alex Smith on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 09:35:05 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency |
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 12:31 -0400, Jamie Dallaire wrote: > I think if players of B (the current PEPs) aren't reading their > spoon-business mail (or even if they've deregistered), that is their > problem. Messaging spoon-business constitutes a quite valid attempt to reach > everyone concerned. > > Besides, wouldn't Wooble's proposition, if true, imply that pretty much > every emergency we've had (at least since I got here) has been invalid, and > some really really old emergency has only just now been initiated? And if > so, shouldn't we be using some really really old emergency procedure rules? > > BP The emergency's still valid if PEPs haven't been notified; it's just that anyone can change the forum by notifying everyone if people were missed out (rule 4e0 section 3). Presumably Wooble's trying just that. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss