Geoffrey Spear on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 12:24:22 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Emergency |
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > (I'll be participating in the non-Wooble emergency, assuming it is > legit, but not in Wooble's emergency where I am not a PEP.) If what's reasonable is defined as what no one points out is unreasonable before the emergency ends, then you are a PEP in the other emergency too, which may be likely to produce a gamestate where the game is named "C Nomic", the Public Forum is the c-nomic forum, and a Consultation establishes that this Emergency was valid all along. C Nomic will then, in all likelyhood, declare war on B Nomic for claiming to be the legitimate successor of itself. -- Wooble _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss