0x44 on Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:36:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Refresh Proposal Ballot |
Jay Campbell wrote: > Below are the Refresh Proposals from Charles, Teucer, 0x44, comex. > Please reply to this forum with your Ballot per: > > 4e0.7. Each PEP may cast a single Ballot by announcing it via the > Emergency Forum. This Ballot shall rank some (or all) of the Refresh > Proposals in order of preference, with the most-preferred alternative > being ranked first, and less-preferred alternatives being given > subsequently higher integers. > > > ============ Charles > > {{Make comex a player, if he was not one already.}} > > ============ Teucer > > {Rule changes first. > > Amend rule 4E79 by replacing the first instance of the string > {Officer. Officers} with {Officer. Officers may only be entities bound > to the Contract defining the Corporation, and if an entity ceases to > be so bound then it also ceases to be an Officer. If no such entity is > defined as an officer then every party to that contract is considered > an Officer. > > Officers}. /* This defeats the CPA. */ > > Amend rule 4E70 by adding to the end: > { > > The text of a Contract may not be taken to compel any behavior on the > part of any player who did not post a message explicitly stating their > consent to be bound by that Contract. /* This part stymies the efforts > of SCAM. */ > > No Contract may be submitted whose text is not provided, in > unencrypted form, in the e-mail message in which the text is > submitted. /* This part prevents future Contracts of Epimenides. That > one isn't nearly as broken as CPA or SCAM, but while we're tidying > things up we might as well. */ > } > > Amend rule 4E7 by adding to the end: > { > > An explicit account of the action undertaken must be posted, in > unencrypted English; defining the action in an unambiguous fashion > without making it known to all English speakers reading the message > does not constitute a valid game action. /* This part keeps me from > posting encrypted text in foreign languages and claiming to do the > plaintext. */ > } > > Now, the gamestate changes. > > Destroy the following contracts: SCAM, Crimson Permanent Assurance Mk > II, lhret rhlhr, Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou, comex's Corporation, > comex's Second Corporation, comex's Third Corporation, and comex's > Mersenne Prime Corporation. > > Replace the Contract of Epimenides with the following text: > > { > Section 1. This Contract is the Articles of Incorporation for a > Corporation known as Epimenides, Inc. This Corporation has two > Officers, known as the Cretan and the Cretin. They may or may not be > the same person at any given time. The Cretin is the party to this > Contract whose most recent instance of becoming bound by this Contract > was earlier than that of any other party to this Contract. The Cretan > is the party to this Contract whose first instance of becoming bound > by this Contract was later than that of any other party to this > Contract. The Cretan has the power to edit this Contract at any time, > but may only do so without objection from other Parties to this > Contract. No section of this Contract may constrain the actions of the > Cretin. The Cretan may not edit this sentence or the sentence before > it, nor may he make any edits which would conflict with the > requirement of the preceding sentence. > > Section 2. All ninjas are mammals. > > Section 3. If a section of this Contract with an even number contains > any assertions of fact (as opposed to sentences which, while phrased > as declaratives, actually serve to bind its Parties' behavior), all > Parties to this Contract except the Cretin are forbidden from taking > any game actions they are able to take which could cause any such > assertion to become untrue. If such an assertion is already untrue, > all Parties to this Contract except the Cretin are required to take > any game actions they are able to take which could cause any such > assertions to become true. Furthermore, all Parties to this Contract > except the Cretin are required at all times to engage in game actions > founded on the premise that all such assertions are true, whether or > not they are. > > Section 4. Ninjas fight ALL the time. > > Section 5. The Cretin is humbly entreated by this Contract to make no > statement of fact on any public forum which is not false. As the > Contract may not bind the Cretin's behavior, however, this is not a > requirement, merely a polite request. > > Section 6. The purpose of a ninja is to flip out and kill people. > > Section 7. If the Cretan posts to a public forum and Epimenides, Inc. > posesses any mackerel or any socks, the Cretan is obligated to include > in the post a transaction indicating that e acts on behalf of the > corporation in such a way as to redistribute those mackerel and socks > to the two Officers of Epimenides, Inc. If the two Officers are > distinct people, the Cretan will do this using the dice server on > nomic.net. Such redistribution need not be random nor equitable. > > Section 8. The player known as teucer has won the game of B Nomic > during the fourth era. > > Section 9. No player may become a Party to this Contract more than > once in a single nweek. > > Section 10. All assertions of fact (as clarified in section 3) > contained in even-numbered sections of the Contract of Epimenides are > false, except possibly this one. > > Section 11. Any party to this contract may cease to be a party to it > at any time. > } > > /* That's for BP. */ > > Amend the gamestate to be such that teucer's enciphered Portuguese > text posted to the public forum was without effect. > > Amend the gamestate to reflect the fact that comex is already a > player. No amendments to the list of players are to be made at this > time. > > Change all PEPs' mental states to Calm. > > Change the Message of the nweek to "Emergencies: like slumps, but with > extra paranoia."} > > ======================= 0x44 > > {{ > Replace the text of 4e5 with: > { > Game Documents are Game Objects that consist of meaningful text > that is readable by any Player without unreasonable effort. > > In each Game Document, with the exception of this paragraph, text > between a forward slash+asterisk character combination and an > asterisk+forward slash character combination or between double square > brackets (that is, text between "/*" and "*/" or between "[[" and "]]") > shall be deemed Comment Text. Comment Text has no direct effect on the > state of the game, although it can be read. > } > > Replace the text of 4e70 with: > { > As a game action, a Legal Entity may create a game document known > as a Contract. Legal entities who are bound by a contract are known as > parties to that contract. > > As a game action, any legal entity may become bound to a contract > by explicitly expressing their voluntary intent to become bound by the > contract, unless the text of that contract would prohibit such an > action. A legal entity may not become bound to a contract by any other > means. For the purposes of this rule, creating a contract is a game > action expressing the creator's voluntary intent to become bound by said > contract. A legal entity may not become bound by a contract by any other > means. > > A contract must specify means by which a party may cease to be > bound that contract. No contract may restrict any party from ceasing to > be bound by that contract, except insofar as the party has outstanding > obligations bestowed by that specific contract. > > Any party to a contract may submit a Consultation indicating > that a specified Legal Entity bound by a specified contract has failed > to fulfill the obligations bestowed upon them by that Contract. If the > Priest of the Consultation finds that the specified legal entity > violated the contract in question, they shall submit an Oracularity > which endeavors to equitably rectify the breach. For the purposes of the > ceasing to be bound by the terms of a contract, compliance with the > PONDERED/Consistent Oracularity will take the place of any outstanding > obligations. > > There exists a Ministry known as the Ministry of Business. The > Ministry of Business, also known as the Arbiter, is responsible for > maintaining a Public Display of all Contracts and their current text and > parties. > > If, at any time, a contract has fewer than one party, it ceases > to be a Game Document. > > Contracts may Things, which are Game Objects that exist only > within the scope of that Contract. Things may be referenced from other > contexts. > } > > Replace the text of 4e79 with: > { > A Contract declaring itself to be a set of Articles of > Incorporation creates a Legal Entity known as a Corporation. Articles of > Incorporation must, at minimum, establish the name of the Corporation > and at define at least one Officer. > > Officers of a Corporation shall collectively ensure that the > Corporation fulfills the obligations specified in its Articles or any > other Contract to which it may be Party. Only a Party to the Articles of > Incorporation may become an Officer of a Corporation. Unless otherwise > restricted by the Articles of Incorporation, an officer may act on > behalf of a Corporation by submitting a game action on behalf of the > Corporation, explicitly stating the actions described in are being > performed by the Corporation. > > Any Corporation, whose Articles of Incorporation do not comply > with this rule, ceases to be a Legal Entity and the Articles of > Incorporation cease to be a Game Object. > } > > Comex is a player. ZOT any extant Consultation calling into question > his Playerhood. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation known as CPA ceases to be a legal entity and its > Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation known as CPA2 ceases to be a legal entity and its > Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation known as SCAM ceases to be a legal entity and its > Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation defined in the "Contract of Epimenides" ceases to > be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game > Document. > > In case the "Contract of Epimenides" does not declare itself to be > an Articles of Incorporation, the "Contract of Epimenides" ceases to be > a Game Object. > > "lhret rhlhr" ceases to be a Game Object. > > Since their Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, all Corporations known as Ninja{some number} cease to be a legal > entity and their Articles of Incorporation cease to be a Game Documents. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation known as "OCB Remote" ceases to be a legal entity > and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised > 4e79, the Corporation known as "teucer's mack heist" ceases to be a > legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "ehird's Corporation" ceases to > be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game > Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "A GREAT THING CORPORATION" > ceases to be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to > be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "comex's Corporation" ceases to > be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game > Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "comex's Second Corporation" > ceases to be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to > be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "comex's Third Corporation" > ceases to be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to > be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "cMPC" ceases to be a legal > entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "Alelaelaelalealealealelaelaou" > ceases to be a legal entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to > be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "Lala" ceases to be a legal > entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the > revised 4e79, the Corporation known as "SCAM" ceases to be a legal > entity and its Articles of Incorporation ceases to be a Game Document. > > The Contract known as "FREE MACKS" ceases to be a Game Document. > }} > > ================ Comex > > I submit the following Refresh Proposal: > { > Amend Rule 4E7 by adding this paragraph at the end: > { > To "specify" a parameter, a person must unambiguously, explicitly > describe it in such a way that it can be reasonably identified by any > English speaker. > } > > Amend Rule 4E70 by replacing: > { > A Legal Entity, as a Game Action, may create a Game Document known as > a Contract. > } > with: > { > A Legal Entity, as a Game Action, may create a Game Document known as > a Contract, specifying its text. > } > > Amend Rule 4E79 by replacing: > { > These Articles must, at a minimum, give the Corporation a name and > define at least one Officer. > } > with: > { > These Articles must, at a minimum, give the Corporation a name and > define at least one Officer; only Legal Entities bound by them can be > defined as Officers. > } > and by replacing: > { > An Officer can, *unless otherwise specified in the Articles of > Incorporation,* act on behalf of a Corporation by sending a message to > the Public Forum explicitly stating that the Actions described in the > message are being performed by the Corporation. > } > with: > { > An Officer can, unless otherwise specified in the Articles of > Incorporation, act on behalf of a Corporation; other entities can also > act on behalf of a Corporation if allowed by the Articles of > Incorporation. > } > > Amend Rule 4E7 by adding this paragraph at the end: > { > A Legal Entity (the Actor) can generally, as a Game Action, act on > behalf of another Legal Entity (the Target) where the Rules allow it. > To do this, the Actor must explicitly state that the action is being > performed by the Target. > } > (No contracts are terminated or amended by this Refresh Proposal; scam > contracts can look out for themselves.) > } > > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > I revised my refresh proposal to remove all instances of "Since its Articles of Incorporation do not comply with the revised 4e79," -- -- 0x44; _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss