Re: [s-d] [s-b] Aaron C's Refresh Porposal

["Aaron Coquet" <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx>]

Should I add on to the end of my addition to rule 1, "No Player may be
called "The Nomic" "?

On Nov 28, 2007 11:35 AM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I also like the side effect of only allowing Players who have been
> around long enough and cared enough to vote in the previous nweek to
> become Priests.  Obviously voting once doesn't guarantee that a player
> actually pays enough attention to know all of the previous caselaw and
> the intricacies of the current ruleset, but it probably doesn't hurt.
>
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 2:14 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Players who are not active still get their vote power set to 1 on
> > Ballotday. The Active property only determines how many votes you need
> > to constitute a quorum, it doesn't determine who gets to vote.
> >
> >
> >
> > Aaron Coquet wrote:
> > > I revise my revised refresh proposal thusly:
> > > {
> > > The day is set to nday 1: Breakday [[to give us more time for the next part]]
> > > All Pending proposals are marked as Historical with a win-state of
> > > Lost. No changes to points or wins are made as a result of this.
> > > The proposals which have just been marked as Historical are all
> > > automatically re-submitted by their original authors.
> > > All ministries are Vacated.
> > >
> > > All players lose the active property.
> > > All players who have not been players for one full nWeek cease to be players.
> > >
> > > [[This means that only people who are actually here will be included
> > > in the voting. In order to become Active, one must post to the PUBLIC
> > > forum. It can be as simple as a message that says "I become active".]]
> > >
> > > All Devices that exist, with the exception of the Holy Hand Grenade of
> > > Antioch, are transformed into the price that was paid for them in
> > > Mack, and are immediately given to the original purchaser. [[so that
> > > no one has any of the new devices which exist in a quantum state, and
> > > no money is lost on the deal.]]
> > >
> > > Al Blueprints are destroyed.
> > >
> > > All rules between 3-12 and 3-14 inclusive are repealed.
> > >
> > > A player is created with the name "The Nomic"
> > > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-12
> > > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-13
> > > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-14
> > > "The Nomic" ceases to be a player.
> > >
> > > Create a new rule in section 1, called "Things not to do":
> > > {
> > > If an action is described, mentioned, or otherwise appears in the
> > > rules, it is known as a "Registered" action.
> > > If an action is prohibited or not allowed in the rules, it is known as
> > > an "Offensive" action.
> > >
> > > Offensive actions may not be taken.
> > > Registered actions can only be taken in a way that is in accordance
> > > with the rule or rules which describe or mention them, or in which
> > > they appear.
> > > }
> > >
> > > [[If i include a reversal of Prop 156, no one can vote in the first
> > > week, I think. ]]
> > >
> > > On Nov 28, 2007 10:20 AM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Quorum just needs to be reduced, I put in for 1/3. If you have 10
> > >> players you should be able to muster 3 votes. As it is now, you need 6
> > >> which is excessive. It probably does need to be changed so that votes
> > >> of abstain count towards reaching a quorum and if you vote for at
> > >> least one proposal, anything you don't vote for is an automatic
> > >> abstain. Prop 156 was in response to the Hand Grenade. There is also
> > >> the issue of quorum for judgment claims. But, this should all be done
> > >> and discussed after the restart.
> > >>
> > >> If anything, make everyone inactive and force everyone to post
> > >> something to regain their active status.
> > >>
> > >> - Hose
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Nov 28, 2007 1:01 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> We really need to repeal Proposal 156's changes to Rule 3-5. That caused
> > >>> our quorum problems, repealing the changes would fix the quorum problems.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> On 11/27/07, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> All players who have been players for one full nWeek gain the active
> > >>>>> property.
> > >>>>> All players who have not been players for one full nWeek cease to be
> > >>>>> players.
> > >>>>> [[This gives everyone who already is a player a chance to be one, and if
> > >>>>> there is debate about whether or not anyone is a player, they can try to
> > >>>>> join again.]]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> I understand the motivation for this except do we really need to makes all
> > >>>> older players active? It will make getting anything at all done practically
> > >>>> impossible in the nweek following the emergency because it will be so hard
> > >>>> to get quorum on any proposal. This active clause should imo be removed or
> > >>>> quorum lowered alongside it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Also, I do like the distinction between offensive and registered actions.
> > >>>> quite clear.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Billy Pilgrim
> > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > >>>> spoon-discuss mailing list
> > >>>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > >>>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>> _______________________________________________
> > >>> spoon-discuss mailing list
> > >>> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > >>> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> spoon-discuss mailing list
> > >> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > >> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > spoon-discuss mailing list
> > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Geoffrey Spear
> http://www.geoffreyspear.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>



-- 
Aaron C
"H. P. Lovecraft is Rock and Roll" -- Neil Gaiman
Don't Panic!
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss