Re: [s-d] [s-b] Wooble's Refresh Proposal

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The reason I chose m910 as the cost for my vote was that was how much
you'd be able to get by liquidating your points. ;)


Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> I revise my Refresh Proposal to read as follows:
>
> {{
> 1. All Waiting Consultations are ZOTTED.
>
> 2. In Rule 1-17, remove the words "any or".
>
> 3. All Factions cease to be Factions.  Any Player who could not pass a
> Membership Test were one to be administered is deregistered.
>
> 4. In Rule 1-2, add the text, at the end: "Game Objects that are not
> Outsiders can only be created, destroyed, or modified if allowed by the Rules,
> in a manner explicitly governed by the Rules. [[Note that while Outsiders are
> exempt from this rule, their Attributes within the game are also Game Objects
> and are not themselves Outsiders, so an Outsider's Attributes are
> subject to this
> rule.]]"
>
> 5. Any existing Blueprints are destroyed. Any devices created during
> nweek 134 are destroyed, and any macks spent by Players for their purchase
> are restored.  [[I don't believe this will effect the Public Display of Players'
> macks; none of these purported purchases were actually deducted on the
> display.]]
>
> 6. The Clock is set to nday 8 nweek 134 nyear 14, third era of B
> Nomic, and the ndelay is set to the value of the Pause.
> }}
>
> I've removed the specific change to Consultation 45 and just Zotted it
> along with the rest; it's Answer would be made moot by my proposed
> change to Rule 1-2, which I've cleaned up to make more explicit and to
> exempt Outsiders from the restriction on being created, destroyed, or
> modified except by the rules.  I don't want to tell any Player that
> they're not allowed to modify themselves outside of the game, and
> while I'd prefer that none of you destroy yourselves either that's
> probably beyond the scope of the rules.  The creation thing wouldn't
> be a problem until one of our future children tried to join the game
> :).
>
> I also dropped the cancellation of unnumbered Pending Proposals since
> I'm fairly certain they're all caught up and we should be allowed to
> vote on any of them the nday after the Pause ends.  Very few of these
> proposals if any had anything to do with the cause of the Emergency
> IMO and I see no reason to make their authors resubmit them and wait
> another week and a half to get them voted on.
>
> I decided to not add a provision granting 0x44 a large number of macks
> or Hose a commemorative CD because bribery is wrong.
>
> --Wooble
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-business mailing list
> spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss