Re: [s-d] [s-b] Aaron C's Refresh Porposal

[0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We really need to repeal Proposal 156's changes to Rule 3-5. That caused
our quorum problems, repealing the changes would fix the quorum problems.


Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> On 11/27/07, Aaron Coquet <farfromunique@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>   
>> All players who have been players for one full nWeek gain the active
>> property.
>> All players who have not been players for one full nWeek cease to be
>> players.
>> [[This gives everyone who already is a player a chance to be one, and if
>> there is debate about whether or not anyone is a player, they can try to
>> join again.]]
>>     
>
>
> I understand the motivation for this except do we really need to makes all
> older players active? It will make getting anything at all done practically
> impossible in the nweek following the emergency because it will be so hard
> to get quorum on any proposal. This active clause should imo be removed or
> quorum lowered alongside it.
>
> Also, I do like the distinction between offensive and registered actions.
> quite clear.
>
> Billy Pilgrim
> _______________________________________________
> spoon-discuss mailing list
> spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss
>   

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss