| Bryan Donlan on Mon, 3 Jan 2005 17:52:50 -0600 (CST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
| Re: [s-d] Re: [auto] BeeDee submits p1976 |
On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 23:44:43 +0000, Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 06:27:08PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 21:48:06 +0000, Jeremy Cook <athena@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The only redundant part of r10 is the part that tells us to > > > follow r10. The rest gives us an important distinction. Maybe we > > > should change it to, "All game entities must abide by all the > > > Rules in effect except r10..." > > > > If we do that, then r10 is explicitly stating that it is powerless, > > which is different from not indicating whether it has power. And that > > would be equivalent to repealing it. > > This I don't see. Why is that explicitly stating that r10 is > powerless? It is stating that game entities must abide by all rules *except* r10, which implies that they are under no obligation to follow r10. -- bd _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss