J.J. Young on 2 Aug 2002 21:23:03 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply |
Joel has set up an escrow, so no volunteer needed. Thanks, though. -JJY ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 2:18 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > Oh, well, in that case, I volunteer to receive the chit choice emails. > Like I said, I'll be tied to my computer pretty much all weekend writing two > important papers for my classes. So I should get them and reply pretty > quickly. > > kdh > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:57 AM > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > > > > I was assuming we would be using dice@xxxxxxx, since I'm not sure if Joel > > has OpenRPG running, and there would be no need to pause for guard > > commitment, reinforcement, or outflankers. We could just roll all three > > rounds for the day at one time. > > > > -JJY > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:36 AM > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > > > > > > > It depends on when you two are planning to get together online. I > can > > > probably make it any time today or this weekend. > > > > > > kdh > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:29 AM > > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > > > > > > > > > > I don't know how to set up an escrow for Egypt and Syria's chit > choices > > > (if > > > > the instructions for this were ever sent to me, I've lost them - > sorry). > > > > Could someone volunteer to act as neutral observer and recieve our > > choices > > > ? > > > > As a reminder, since the Egyptian corps is British-controlled, it has > a > > > "2" > > > > tactical rating for its corps commander, while the Turkish-controlled > > > Syria > > > > corps has a "1". So based only on tactical ratings, the Syrians will > be > > > > rolling at -1, the Egyptians at 0. > > > > > > > > -JJY > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:55 PM > > > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > > > > > > > > > > > > > Another question on the same topic: I recall that once upon a > > time > > > > the > > > > > idea was floated that we would not require a corps to lay siege on > the > > > > first > > > > > turn that it arrived, but *would* require it to lay siege on > > subsequent > > > > > turns. Did we decide to go with that, or was that idea rejected? > My > > > > > perception of the rules is that a besieger can decide to stop the > > siege > > > > any > > > > > time he wants and still remain in the area. (I don't know why he'd > > ever > > > > > *want* to do that, but there may be a reason.) > > > > > Of course, as we all know, my understanding of the rules is > still > > > > > incomplete, so I could be wrong. If I am wrong and there is > decisive > > > > rules > > > > > language on this issue, could you please point me to it? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > > > kdh > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:32 PM > > > > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 10:00 AM 8/1/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > > > > > > Everett, you are right. If the an enemy corps is already > > > > besieged, > > > > > then > > > > > > >you do not need to stop movement and declare an attack. You can > > > > continue > > > > > > >moving right on by, if you wish. Or you can stop and join the > > siege. > > > > Or > > > > > > >you can stop, and subsequently decide to lift the siege. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >kdh > > > > > > > > > > > > That last one is an important one to point out, I think. The fact > > > that > > > > > you > > > > > > need to supply a corps that stops in an area where you are > involved > > in > > > a > > > > > > siege so as to allow it to join the siege or all corps must lift > the > > > > > siege. > > > > > > > > > > > > There is one last scenario where you can continue > movement, > > > but > > > > I > > > > > > expect it'll be a rare one. Once a corps is in a city, it remains > > > there > > > > > > until its owner's turn when they can spend zero movement points to > > > > remove > > > > > > it from the city. This could lead to a situation where you enter > an > > > > area > > > > > > with an enemy corps that has not yet left its city. In that case, > > you > > > > > > could also continue movement. I imagine this is most likely if > you > > > > > abandon > > > > > > a siege and then have another corps pass by that turn or if two > > > nations > > > > > are > > > > > > at war with a third and are not using combined movement to > > coordinate > > > > > their > > > > > > actions. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > eia mailing list > > > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > eia mailing list > > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > eia mailing list > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > eia mailing list > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > eia mailing list > > eia@xxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia