Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply

["Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

    Oh, well, in that case, I volunteer to receive the chit choice emails.
Like I said, I'll be tied to my computer pretty much all weekend writing two
important papers for my classes.  So I should get them and reply pretty
quickly.

kdh

----- Original Message -----
From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:57 AM
Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply


> I was assuming we would be using dice@xxxxxxx, since I'm not sure if Joel
> has OpenRPG running, and there would be no need to pause for guard
> commitment, reinforcement, or outflankers.  We could just roll all three
> rounds for the day at one time.
>
> -JJY
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 11:36 AM
> Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply
>
>
> >     It depends on when you two are planning to get together online.  I
can
> > probably make it any time today or this weekend.
> >
> > kdh
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "J.J. Young" <jjy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 9:29 AM
> > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply
> >
> >
> > > I don't know how to set up an escrow for Egypt and Syria's chit
choices
> > (if
> > > the instructions for this were ever sent to me, I've lost them -
sorry).
> > > Could someone volunteer to act as neutral observer and recieve our
> choices
> > ?
> > > As a reminder, since the Egyptian corps is British-controlled, it has
a
> > "2"
> > > tactical rating for its corps commander, while the Turkish-controlled
> > Syria
> > > corps has a "1".  So based only on tactical ratings, the Syrians will
be
> > > rolling at -1, the Egyptians at 0.
> > >
> > > -JJY
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Kyle H" <menexenus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 7:55 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply
> > >
> > >
> > > >     Another question on the same topic:  I recall that once upon a
> time
> > > the
> > > > idea was floated that we would not require a corps to lay siege on
the
> > > first
> > > > turn that it arrived, but *would* require it to lay siege on
> subsequent
> > > > turns.  Did we decide to go with that, or was that idea rejected?
My
> > > > perception of the rules is that a besieger can decide to stop the
> siege
> > > any
> > > > time he wants and still remain in the area.  (I don't know why he'd
> ever
> > > > *want* to do that, but there may be a reason.)
> > > >     Of course, as we all know, my understanding of the rules is
still
> > > > incomplete, so I could be wrong.  If I am wrong and there is
decisive
> > > rules
> > > > language on this issue, could you please point me to it?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > kdh
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:32 PM
> > > > Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > At 10:00 AM 8/1/2002 -0400, you wrote:
> > > > > >     Everett, you are right.  If the an enemy corps is already
> > > besieged,
> > > > then
> > > > > >you do not need to stop movement and declare an attack.  You can
> > > continue
> > > > > >moving right on by, if you wish.  Or you can stop and join the
> siege.
> > > Or
> > > > > >you can stop, and subsequently decide to lift the siege.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >kdh
> > > > >
> > > > > That last one is an important one to point out, I think.  The fact
> > that
> > > > you
> > > > > need to supply a corps that stops in an area where you are
involved
> in
> > a
> > > > > siege so as to allow it to join the siege or all corps must lift
the
> > > > siege.
> > > > >
> > > > >          There is one last scenario where you can continue
movement,
> > but
> > > I
> > > > > expect it'll be a rare one.  Once a corps is in a city, it remains
> > there
> > > > > until its owner's turn when they can spend zero movement points to
> > > remove
> > > > > it from the city.  This could lead to a situation where you enter
an
> > > area
> > > > > with an enemy corps that has not yet left its city.  In that case,
> you
> > > > > could also continue movement.  I imagine this is most likely if
you
> > > > abandon
> > > > > a siege and then have another corps pass by that turn or if two
> > nations
> > > > are
> > > > > at war with a third and are not using combined movement to
> coordinate
> > > > their
> > > > > actions.
> > > > >
> > > > > Mike
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > eia mailing list
> > > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > eia mailing list
> > > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > eia mailing list
> > > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > eia mailing list
> > eia@xxxxxxxxx
> > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> eia mailing list
> eia@xxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia

_______________________________________________
eia mailing list
eia@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia