Kyle H on 2 Aug 2002 00:06:05 -0000 |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply |
Another question on the same topic: I recall that once upon a time the idea was floated that we would not require a corps to lay siege on the first turn that it arrived, but *would* require it to lay siege on subsequent turns. Did we decide to go with that, or was that idea rejected? My perception of the rules is that a besieger can decide to stop the siege any time he wants and still remain in the area. (I don't know why he'd ever *want* to do that, but there may be a reason.) Of course, as we all know, my understanding of the rules is still incomplete, so I could be wrong. If I am wrong and there is decisive rules language on this issue, could you please point me to it? Thanks, kdh ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Gorman" <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <eia@xxxxxxxxx> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:32 PM Subject: Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply > At 10:00 AM 8/1/2002 -0400, you wrote: > > Everett, you are right. If the an enemy corps is already besieged, then > >you do not need to stop movement and declare an attack. You can continue > >moving right on by, if you wish. Or you can stop and join the siege. Or > >you can stop, and subsequently decide to lift the siege. > > > >kdh > > That last one is an important one to point out, I think. The fact that you > need to supply a corps that stops in an area where you are involved in a > siege so as to allow it to join the siege or all corps must lift the siege. > > There is one last scenario where you can continue movement, but I > expect it'll be a rare one. Once a corps is in a city, it remains there > until its owner's turn when they can spend zero movement points to remove > it from the city. This could lead to a situation where you enter an area > with an enemy corps that has not yet left its city. In that case, you > could also continue movement. I imagine this is most likely if you abandon > a siege and then have another corps pass by that turn or if two nations are > at war with a third and are not using combined movement to coordinate their > actions. > > Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > eia mailing list > eia@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia > _______________________________________________ eia mailing list eia@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/eia