|Michael Gorman on 1 Aug 2002 01:54:16 -0000|
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
|Re: [eia] Question: all-or-nothing and supply|
Yes, if we assume that the defending corps is not already besieged when the attacking corps arrives, then the attacking corps must stop movement. If the defending corps retires, then the attacking corps will have an option as to whether or not to lay siege. However, this is *not* a house rule. Through the discussion process, we discovered (with Mike's guidance) that this is actually what the rules say as they are written. Hence, it is not a house rule at all. Or to put it another way, our house rule is redundant.
So correct me if I'm wrong, but here's a possibility that I can foresee. (I'm not trying to have a rules debate. I'm just trying to figure out if the way I am thinking is correct.) Suppose that the Letters are at war with the Numbers. It is the Letters' turn to move during the land phase. Corps A moves into a square with unbesieged enemy Corps 1. By the rules (184.108.40.206) Corps A must halt movement and declare an attack. At this point, the Letters should refrain from sending out any more land orders until Corps 1 has decided whether it will retire or not. Suppose Corps 1 chooses to retire. Now the Letters' land phase continues. The Letters choose to move Corps B into the same area as Corps A (and Corps 1). However, since Corps 1 is now located inside the city, Corps B could potentially continue moving.
Is this right? If not, where have I gone wrong?