[eia] JJ's post

[Michael Gorman <mpgorman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> 1.) 
> A defender in a city should be able to build a sea supply depot there
> whether the attacker outside is laying siege or not.
>

        

That
sounds like a reasonable modification to me.  

> 2.) 
> All or none of the attacking corps that end up surrounding a city must
> lay siege to that city.

        

I can see
this one argued either way and I'm happy with whatever everyone wants for
this rule.

Oh, it looks like you are supposed to note on the map that there is a
siege or not a siege.

7.5.1.1.2: If they {all} do so retire,
the attackers may, if desired, be placed on top of the forces and a siege
occurs.

Kind of an annoying way to show it with cardboard pieces, but pretty
usable for an electronic map.

Mike