Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.

Jay Campbell on Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:38:03 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2008 19:37:58 -0800
In-reply-to: <285c99840812291932m6c5a5e1uebc8aa3f027a226b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <F0529F3D-9AF5-476D-8178-9DFFE20540AF@xxxxxxxxx> <D00D50AA-FE37-419A-9D56-916B081D7D07@xxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280812291901sa59a0a5y3460657d7f35a4b4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812291918xcfc7f78i7e79b96409232df5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <495994C3.60700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840812291932m6c5a5e1uebc8aa3f027a226b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (Windows/20081105)

Right now I am leaning toward forfeit, only because of the Secret ruleset

If there were a cabal, they would be in deep discourse about this. Thereisn't, of course, so they aren't, but, you know, if there were, theywould be right now.


j

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
  - From: Charles Schaefer

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
  - From: Charles Schaefer

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] What the fuck.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fuck it.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread