Arkady English on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 09:14:13 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset |
On 20 September 2012 17:06, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Such as? A neutral party is required to receive moves (which are made >> secretly) and publish them at the very least. I don't think the game >> works at all without a Sec. gen. >> > > Something like this: > > In the event the Sec. Gen has not fulfilled his duties in a timely fashion > (defined herein as within X time frame), the players shall elect from their > number a new Sec. Gen. Upon assumption of the role of Sec. Gen, the > player's territories become neutral. The concept of a "neutral territory" does not exist yet. I'll add this because it's a good idea, but change "territories" to "units". _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss