Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset

[Kerim Aydin <kerim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, 0x44 wrote:
> > Such as? A neutral party is required to receive moves (which are made
> > secretly) and publish them at the very least. I don't think the game
> > works at all without a Sec. gen.
> >
> 
> Something like this:
> 
> In the event the Sec. Gen has not fulfilled his duties in a timely fashion
> (defined herein as within X time frame), the players shall elect from their
> number a new Sec. Gen. Upon assumption of the role of Sec. Gen, the
> player's territories become neutral.

There may be enough observers in this forum so that someone outside would 
step in if we begged - which would be preferable, as deciding whose territories 
should become neutral could become quite a balance-disrupting and (possibly 
unresolvable) negotiation!  So option of electing an outsider should be 
included.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss