Arkady English on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:39:08 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset


On 20 September 2012 11:15, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Arkady English <arkadyenglish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Such as? A neutral party is required to receive moves (which are made
>> secretly) and publish them at the very least. I don't think the game
>> works at all without a Sec. gen.
>
> We could totally recover by going into Emergency Mode and adopting a
> mail hold and deliver service or a full-blown judging codenomic bot.
> _______________________________________________

Many other nomic variants have managed without such measures in the
initial ruleset - (I note Nomicopoly did so).

Do judging codenomic bots even exist, or are you just trolling me now?
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss