Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset

Geoffrey Spear on Thu, 20 Sep 2012 03:15:38 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
From: Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 06:15:13 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=3GhQkK/MQ7ntjeLQNIBM8X1WuBe3hW2mNCZl1DN4JU8=; b=G+sTURbck8ARuu9I3cXWsXhsBIkJNXqWLN8COBBWYVKWTq3Athxvv0c6S7/xx5kVCs krrN+sFOM40h+NpKCpa4eTomR/wqXNso61k6r3sjgPYNr+MzRl4bzPrRikTPdCeiTA1v icw58mCszAbOZlm9UlqkybZQ8SUXx/69Z6E1up5kNauBNabt+/ziXYqzXjTKsf/JG/tF bLPrKIjFgoN2BaKxXvnJdqskIs666DyY41zwf83lPXiwbyGXqBEHdJHcJ0+Z+abuYy30 kZR3UdLj4eyj3oOeCGXCE7aNJf0wjzbkE3ftS/GfDSB3uOQ17dhtQOZsWtKQ6vXpYZLA tmSQ==
In-reply-to: <CAH4xcLpd0nYiVbEMh6eKysOSsxGTvaYAGrVY4vPcy3K1te9Dog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAH4xcLr5NbZiM3MZwk5oUyAJLAWv0Zt0f9eZEWNrqgKW2Wb82w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.LRH.2.01.1209180949110.25848@hymn32.u.washington.edu> <CAH4xcLqon=Kdc8ZdhXzMvxxQt0qxtvjNBY9vYLKD-KD=dALvfw@mail.gmail.com> <CAF_GqHj6NGb-zvfKKu4-oARJDsO=OOOS69yTucbM-bZAkoRv6g@mail.gmail.com> <CAH4xcLpd0nYiVbEMh6eKysOSsxGTvaYAGrVY4vPcy3K1te9Dog@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Arkady English <arkadyenglish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Such as? A neutral party is required to receive moves (which are made
> secretly) and publish them at the very least. I don't think the game
> works at all without a Sec. gen.

We could totally recover by going into Emergency Mode and adopting a
mail hold and deliver service or a full-blown judging codenomic bot.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: Arkady English

References:
- [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: Arkady English
- Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: Kerim Aydin
- Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: Arkady English
- Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
  - From: Arkady English

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] Dipnomicy - revised initial ruleset
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread