Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah

[Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Elliott Hird
<penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 2009/2/18 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Agreed. Although it doesn't matter; those Points of Order will never
>>> be gathered because the State of Unrest ended (and I believe a new one
>>> then began, although nobody's offered themself up for chairman duty).
>>
>> point of order: 5E0 doesn't say the procedure ends when the State of
>> Unrest ends; I still became obligated to gather the selected points of
>> order today, and have done so.
>>
>> I'm now capable of implementing them "if necessary", and if I do
>> implement all of them, everyone becomes Calm.  If I only implement
>> some of them, you'll have to calm yourselves.
>
> please implement them in a non-paradoxical order k thanx

I was planning to just implement one of them, saving the rest for
later, and if they somehow cease to exist in the meantime, that would
just be a damn shame.
-- 
Wooble
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss