Alex Smith on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:04 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah


On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:18 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Incidentally, I'm relatively happy to just by fiat Approve a gamestate
> > some time in the fifth era, and continue playing from that point, in a
> > sort of Reincarnated B. That way, the gamestate we're in is the same
> > between the "everything is OK" players and the "everything is broken,
> > let's start again" players.
> 
> That was my intention, but obviously fiat approving a gamestate where
> we're in a broken emergency wasn't the right procedure, especially
> since the non-broken universe didn't need an emergency to fix what
> wasn't broken.

I mean Approve as in ratify. If we're going to fiat start from a
gamestate, let's at least make sure we all think it's the same one...
-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss