Alex Smith on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:23:04 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah |
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:18 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Alex Smith <ais523@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Incidentally, I'm relatively happy to just by fiat Approve a gamestate > > some time in the fifth era, and continue playing from that point, in a > > sort of Reincarnated B. That way, the gamestate we're in is the same > > between the "everything is OK" players and the "everything is broken, > > let's start again" players. > > That was my intention, but obviously fiat approving a gamestate where > we're in a broken emergency wasn't the right procedure, especially > since the non-broken universe didn't need an emergency to fix what > wasn't broken. I mean Approve as in ratify. If we're going to fiat start from a gamestate, let's at least make sure we all think it's the same one... -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss