Alex Smith on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:13:39 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah


On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:10 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Elliott Hird
> <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > And effective and legal in the It's All OK Universe.
> 
> Well, it's fairly illegal in the It's All OK Universe since I'm not
> MoM, but I'm willing to face the consequences of this action.

I think it's rather likely that nobody's sufficiently sure of what
exactly is going on at the moment to try to prosecute.

Incidentally, I'm relatively happy to just by fiat Approve a gamestate
some time in the fifth era, and continue playing from that point, in a
sort of Reincarnated B. That way, the gamestate we're in is the same
between the "everything is OK" players and the "everything is broken,
let's start again" players.

-- 
ais523

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss