Alex Smith on Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:13:39 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah |
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 14:10 -0500, Geoffrey Spear wrote: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:54 PM, Elliott Hird > <penguinofthegods@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > And effective and legal in the It's All OK Universe. > > Well, it's fairly illegal in the It's All OK Universe since I'm not > MoM, but I'm willing to face the consequences of this action. I think it's rather likely that nobody's sufficiently sure of what exactly is going on at the moment to try to prosecute. Incidentally, I'm relatively happy to just by fiat Approve a gamestate some time in the fifth era, and continue playing from that point, in a sort of Reincarnated B. That way, the gamestate we're in is the same between the "everything is OK" players and the "everything is broken, let's start again" players. -- ais523 _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss