Elliott Hird on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:42:19 -0700 (MST)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah


2009/2/18 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Agreed. Although it doesn't matter; those Points of Order will never
>> be gathered because the State of Unrest ended (and I believe a new one
>> then began, although nobody's offered themself up for chairman duty).
>
> point of order: 5E0 doesn't say the procedure ends when the State of
> Unrest ends; I still became obligated to gather the selected points of
> order today, and have done so.
>
> I'm now capable of implementing them "if necessary", and if I do
> implement all of them, everyone becomes Calm.  If I only implement
> some of them, you'll have to calm yourselves.

please implement them in a non-paradoxical order k thanx
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss