Elliott Hird on Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:42:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] bah |
2009/2/18 Geoffrey Spear <wooble@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Craig Daniel <teucer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Agreed. Although it doesn't matter; those Points of Order will never >> be gathered because the State of Unrest ended (and I believe a new one >> then began, although nobody's offered themself up for chairman duty). > > point of order: 5E0 doesn't say the procedure ends when the State of > Unrest ends; I still became obligated to gather the selected points of > order today, and have done so. > > I'm now capable of implementing them "if necessary", and if I do > implement all of them, everyone becomes Calm. If I only implement > some of them, you'll have to calm yourselves. please implement them in a non-paradoxical order k thanx _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss