Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

Jay Campbell on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:50:40 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:50:34 -0800
In-reply-to: <dbedf4da0901042148i74ff9b83mad0f60d5e1e6fbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4961499A.3060505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041659w398e3e66q4241b95c274d67d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496167D8.8000303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041758s2ce60975l7c8cf492c18937bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49616A54.2000601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041845n10d30756lf026b8523875d504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4961776A.7090800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0901042148i74ff9b83mad0f60d5e1e6fbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

Tyler wrote:

Maybe you could just make the Contract uneditable without unanimous consent.
Then you wouldn't have to worry so much about escaping abusers. And if you
had to you could make a new Contract when it needs fixing.

Unanimous consent and contract sanity have not gone hand in hand herelately.



_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Tyler

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Bums
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread