Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

Jay Campbell on Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:58:58 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:58:50 -0800
In-reply-to: <6bf32280901041845n10d30756lf026b8523875d504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4961499A.3060505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041659w398e3e66q4241b95c274d67d3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <496167D8.8000303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041758s2ce60975l7c8cf492c18937bd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <49616A54.2000601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280901041845n10d30756lf026b8523875d504@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209)

This is a good faith document designed to thwart one of the more obvious
abuses of the game. The contract itself apparently needs a Good Faith clause
so folks can trust there's no trickery behind it.


How about stating that the MoM can't leave the contract?


I don't want to be trapped by any mistakes I made.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Tyler

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
  - From: comex

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: ehird's macks
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Contract: Protect MoM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread