Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

0x44 on Fri, 17 Oct 2008 16:31:14 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 18:33:08 -0500
In-reply-to: <55b258c20810162055q18a859c8nb99938469e1ced52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F734E0.5040909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F74EB9.1020001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fa0147d90810161144v1fa610e3w2872cdc1d4ba234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F7D3E5.9040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6bf32280810161745y72ad8c9fg137ea84933d0d5bc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <653283240810162034k255cd316wa1372eaabee7c68e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <55b258c20810162055q18a859c8nb99938469e1ced52@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Craig Daniel wrote:
> That's why I'm for keeping the ones that don't depend on the loopholes
> the emergency is patching. Like Epimenides.
>   
As a non-member to Epimenides, I don't know that Epimenides violates the 
patches or not. If your contract is clean under my proposed changes, 
nothing is preventing you from resubmitting your contract. I think that 
Epimienides violates my proposed changes to 4e5, however.

-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Craig Daniel

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Taral
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: comex
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Geoffrey Spear
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Craig Daniel

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're going to keep taking game actions through the emergency...
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] If we're going to keep taking game actions through the emergency...
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread