Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

comex on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 17:45:28 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
From: comex <comexk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 20:45:22 -0400
In-reply-to: <48F7D3E5.9040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F734E0.5040909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F74EB9.1020001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fa0147d90810161144v1fa610e3w2872cdc1d4ba234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F7D3E5.9040208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 7:53 PM, 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Perhaps not, but manually terminating the contracts removes the clutter.

Yeah, but killing unrelated minor scams (comex's Corporation, FREE
MACKS) without seeing whether they worked first is No Fun.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Geoffrey Spear

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Taral
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread