Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

0x44 on Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:51:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
From: 0x44 <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 18:53:09 -0500
In-reply-to: <fa0147d90810161144v1fa610e3w2872cdc1d4ba234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48F734E0.5040909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48F74EB9.1020001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <fa0147d90810161144v1fa610e3w2872cdc1d4ba234@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

Taral wrote:
> I think this is a bit overkill. It shouldn't be necessary to manually
> terminate all those contracts...
>   
Perhaps not, but manually terminating the contracts removes the clutter.


-- 
--
0x44;

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: comex

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
  - From: Taral

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Shameless
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] 0x44's Refresh Proposal [Revised].
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread