Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers

Jay Campbell on Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:48:53 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
From: Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 11:48:45 -0700
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650810021139g5577119at3a3fb7b30922d55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <48E41CC0.20105@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <285c99840810011931s92e0435hf446ac0b165a735a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810012328u776b2165v9eff26be30feca59@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dbedf4da0810020949l282a45f3s9b5ce4982bd7c480@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E4FFD3.6050303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810021017p12abef66h2248c37a591a2701@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E50A29.1020909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810021124u43b4692al73f8b49f5c3e71df@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E513E7.3090300@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650810021139g5577119at3a3fb7b30922d55@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)

>> Get me in the members list and I'll start changing proposals to Black.
>>     
>
>
> I'm not against it. As soon as the corps issue you brought up is resolved
> I'll post a motion to allow new members.
>
>   


This might make it easier: The sock corps are caused to exist by 4E68:

"For each sock color there exists one Laundry Corporation titled "XXX 
Corporation" where XXX is the color of that sock."

The sock rule has a higher precedence than the contracts rule that wants 
to poof them.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Charles Schaefer
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Tyler
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jamie Dallaire
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jay Campbell
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retroactive registration
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Retroactive registration
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread