Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 2 Oct 2008 11:24:19 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] hostile takeovers |
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Jay Campbell <bnomic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The text from that earlier version: > > "A Potential Sockholder may become a member of this contract by > announcement or by purchasing a Black sock." > > I had already purched a black sock, automatically wrapping me into > membership -- one interpretation. That earlier version only existed after you purchased a Black sock. Before that, the "or by purchasing a Black sock" part was absent. I added it in after becoming a member by announcement, and subsequently Ty-Guy 6 and then 0x44 became members. > If socks survive my last email I plan to file a consultation around this > fuzziness. This is a good point. That challenge might actually be valid :-S If the corps do exist, we really should submit something in Black Corp to clear up this whole member business. If the corps don't exist, we need some sort of emergency or at least a ratification of Public Displays, rather than tediously attempting to backtrack gamestate. Good play, BP _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss