Ed Murphy on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:59:59 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

Billy Pilgrim wrote:

> The goal of including the block of text bit (as a
> comment, oops) was just to prevent people working around the restriction on
> naming rule 4e41 by refering to its section.

"alludes to" is also necessary, otherwise it could be trivially
worked around by proposing e.g. "Repeal all rules except for 4E1
through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100".
spoon-discuss mailing list