Antonio Dolcetta on Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:09:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

On 6 Feb 2008, at 03:22, Ed Murphy wrote:

> Billy Pilgrim wrote:
>> The goal of including the block of text bit (as a
>> comment, oops) was just to prevent people working around the  
>> restriction on
>> naming rule 4e41 by refering to its section.
> "alludes to" is also necessary, otherwise it could be trivially
> worked around by proposing e.g. "Repeal all rules except for 4E1
> through 4E40 and 4E42 through 4E100".

I would surely become paranoid if I saw something like this in the  
ballot. Or at least feel a bit nervous.
spoon-discuss mailing list