Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

Roger Hicks on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:24:08 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 15:24:01 -0700
In-reply-to: <44e5a2650802051302q252c6beekc04fc5885c10eebe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <169695.7652.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051302q252c6beekc04fc5885c10eebe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 5, 2008 2:02 PM, Jamie Dallaire <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> from 4E41: ''This applies to specific references to Rule 4E41 or to a set of
> Rules or a block of text containing it....''
>
A rule section is neither a set of rules nor a block of text that
contains 4e41. It is simply an identifier for certain rules.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Justin Ahmann
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] Artificial Complements
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread