Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings

Roger Hicks on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:25:17 -0700 (MST)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
From: "Roger Hicks" <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:25:12 -0700
In-reply-to: <6d741b990802051455o24e5c30fiba2c7666be8b758b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <937906.93524.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47A8CE74.1090601@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <44e5a2650802051305q7f86803due4ac07930986d003@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <56732cfd0802051357u7207a4bif029e779fcd3aa15@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <6d741b990802051455o24e5c30fiba2c7666be8b758b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Feb 5, 2008 3:55 PM, Mike McGann <mike.mcgann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> For the record, I will never support or vote FOR any hurried proposal
> that does not need to be hurried.

Can I ask why? I've been considering proposing multiple voting periods
each nweek because 1) I think 12 days ends up being too long between
rule-changes and 2) It leads to massive ballots which are a PITA both
for the ministers involved and the voters.

BobTHJ
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: Mike McGann

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
  - From: Mike McGann

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] purchases, turnings
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread