Jamie Dallaire on Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:02:17 -0700 (MST) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Rule Categorization |
from 4E41: ''This applies to specific references to Rule 4E41 or to a set of Rules or a block of text containing it....'' Which means you can't refer to the stuff that doesn't really fit anywhere category... So BobTHJ's attempt did not work... Methinks Happy Froggies is unnecessary, but perhaps in a different way. Try: Create section xyz Move rules number (actual number of each rule in the stuff category except for 41) into section xyz. Now only 4e41 would be in that section which would basically be meaningless. And we'd be free to organize the rest outside of that section as we see fit. BP On Feb 5, 2008 3:52 PM, Justin Ahmann <quesmarktion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I just realized that "Happy Froggies" is unnecessary. I guess I'll have > to change it... > > Codae > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> > To: spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > Sent: Tuesday, February 5, 2008 3:45:27 PM > Subject: [s-b] Rule Categorization > > As a Game Action I intend to the following without objection: > > Move rules 4e65, 4e66, 4e67, 4e68, 4e69, and 4e71 to the section > "Gameplay" > > Move rule 4e64 to the section "Justice" > > Move rule 4e70 to the section "Stuff that doesn't really fit anywhere > else" > > BobTHJ > _______________________________________________ > spoon-business mailing list > spoon-business@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-business > _______________________________________________ > spoon-discuss mailing list > spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx > http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss