Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.

Ed Murphy on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:01:16 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.

To: discussion list for B Nomic <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
From: Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 07:58:40 -0800
In-reply-to: <4798B186.80309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4797E531.50204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47981B0C.8040204@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47988E9C.3090108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4798B05D.7010807@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4798B186.80309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0

0x44 wrote:

> Did you include the (-1) macks I gave everyone? Including Pikhq, that
> would have added up to m25, and I think about six people took their
> macks back.

Didn't you follow that up by reversing the action for everyone who
hadn't already reversed it from their end?  That probably explains
the 1m discrepancies, including Codae (ISTR one player reversing
after your blanket declaration).

_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Jamie Dallaire

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: 0x44

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread