Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.

Jamie Dallaire on Thu, 24 Jan 2008 19:22:41 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.

To: "discussion list for B Nomic" <spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
From: "Jamie Dallaire" <bad.leprechaun@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:22:38 -0500
In-reply-to: <4798B5B0.10203@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <4797E531.50204@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <47981B0C.8040204@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <47988E9C.3090108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4798B05D.7010807@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <4798B186.80309@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4798B5B0.10203@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jan 24, 2008 10:58 AM, Ed Murphy <emurphy42@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Didn't you follow that up by reversing the action for everyone who
> hadn't already reversed it from their end?  That probably explains
> the 1m discrepancies, including Codae (ISTR one player reversing
> after your blanket declaration).
>

0x44 did attempt to reverse the action by "taking back" -1 mackerel from
everyone who hadn't taken theirs back yet. As I pointed out after, it is
impossible to "take" mackerel from anyone.

BP

PS: Wooble I will dig through the ministry stuff later and see if I screwed
up.
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss

References:
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Ed Murphy
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: 0x44
- Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
  - From: Ed Murphy

Prev by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Consultation: Hot Tomato
Next by Date: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Game Actions.
Next by thread: Re: [s-d] [s-b] Revise proposal #309
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread