Jamie Dallaire on Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:23:13 +0100 (CET)


[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] Fire sale!


On Jan 10, 2008 6:03 PM, Geoffrey Spear <geoffspear@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I believe the Consultation system should probably be fixed so that an
> Answer to a question about an actual ambiguity in the gamestate
> implicitly creates an Oracularity setting the gamestate to what it
> would be if the Answer were true.  The oracularity tweaks work great
> for when the Rules are ambiguous and need to be changed to become
> unambiguous, but for assertions about the current state of the game
> they shouldn't be necessary.


Yes. Propose that and I'll vote for it.

Also I checked, and Codae ain't stabbed nobody.

BP
_______________________________________________
spoon-discuss mailing list
spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss