Roger Hicks on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:15:57 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal |
On Nov 29, 2007 11:04 AM, William P. Berard <william.berard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Both those argument are valid, but my point was rather that, unless you > fear there is an immediate risk that Players might sumbit actions that > would threatend the quantic stability of the game immediately once we > get out of pause, I do not see why those issues (which are real) could > not be addressed through regular proposals,, once we are out of the > emergency. > In my opinion, it is better to solve the problem now then to risk having another state of emergency (which puts a serious delay on the game) before the next batch of proposals can be resolved. That being said, if my refresh proposal is not selected, I intend to submit the Oracularity system it describes as a separate proposal, as I think it is important to the future of B Nomic. BobTHJ _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss