William Berard on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:31:20 +0100 (CET)

[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [s-d] [s-b] BobTHJ's Refresh Proposal

On 11/29/07, Roger Hicks <pidgepot@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Final revision to my refresh proposal:
> Summary of changes (mostly copied from other refresh proposals):
> * Eliminating provision to cancel currently open proposals.
> * Ratifying the Player report (so Macks are not lost for recent device
> purchases)
> * Sets the clock to nday 6 (to allow 3 days for proposals to be made
> and reviewed before voting begins)
> Note that I have tried to keep this proposal as slimmed down as
> possible. The bulk of its text deals with the changes to invalid
> actions and the Oracularity system. In my opinion, these are necessary
> changes to ensure that further abuse of the same kind that started
> this emergency does not occur again. I appreciate your comments and
> consideration, and I respectfully ask for you vote in the upcoming
> selection process.

Just for the sake of argument, although I previously described myself as a
supporter of your RP, what exactly is the advantage of choosing your RP over
wooble's, bearing in mind the oracularity system (which I incidentaly
support) you propose could be submitted as a proper proposal, and voted for
independantly? (to your benefit since you'd get some points for it)
spoon-discuss mailing list