0x44 on Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:39:01 +0100 (CET) |
[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Re: [s-d] [s-b] Aaron C's Refresh Porposal |
What do you have against Rule 3-13? Aaron Coquet wrote: > I submit the following refresh proposal: > { > The day is set to nday 1: Breakday [[to give us more time for the next > part]] > All Pending proposals are marked as Historical with a win-state of Lost. No > changes to points or wins are made as a result of this. > The proposals which are currently Pending are all automatically re-submitted > by their original authors. > All ministries are Vacated. > > All players who have been players for one full nWeek gain the active > property. > All players who have not been players for one full nWeek cease to be > players. > [[This gives everyone who already is a player a chance to be one, and if > there is debate about whether or not anyone is a player, they can try to > join again.]] > > All Devices that exist are transformed into the price that was paid for them > in Mack. > Al Blueprints are destroyed. > > All rules between 3-12 and 3-14 inclusive are repealed. > > A player is created with the name "The Nomic" > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-12 > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-13 > "The Nomic" submits a proposal to add back rule 3-14 > "The Nomic" ceases to be a player. > } > [[I can't think of anything else that needs to be covered. Please let me > know if you think of anything.]] > > _______________________________________________ spoon-discuss mailing list spoon-discuss@xxxxxxxxx http://lists.ellipsis.cx/mailman/listinfo/spoon-discuss